Yesterday attended a forum organised by the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN), an umbrella organisation comprised of bodies working for justice and peace for Palestine, which I am an individual member.
The main issues included the question of a two state solution versus a one state one, and BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions).
I’m strongly in favour of BDS, as it is an effective (cf South Africa) peaceful method of action, indeed the only one available to us, though I must point out that it is not to be directed against Israel per second, only those aspects of it engaged in illegal activity, which of course is a awful lot of stuff, including anything to do with the occupation, the Wall, and the settlements.
I also volunteered to work with another member to research the links Australian universities have with the Israeli military, which we know are many and deep,
The other big issue is that of two states, or one. Certainly the two state solution is hardly tenable given the amount of territory Israel has appropriated, but a one state solution would have to ensure that the Israelis didn’t rule over a dispossessed Palestinian peasantry, so it is not a cut and dried matter. A ‘bi-state’ might help to prevent that, though I’d still like to see a campaign for two states based on the pre-1967 border, the right of return, and demolition the of the wall and the settlements. A big ask, I know!
The day finished with he APAN AGM, which was uneventful except for it re-affirming APAN’s in principle support for BDS, and being open to one or two states, depending on the wishes of the Palestinians.